|
Post by Neshead on Oct 20, 2017 17:22:13 GMT
Charlton to give us it up the shitter 4-1. Billy Clarke to score. Put your house on it.
|
|
|
Post by Hobhead on Oct 20, 2017 17:22:58 GMT
What's the odds on that?
|
|
|
Post by Nice boy on Oct 20, 2017 17:23:09 GMT
Has Clarke been getting on at Charlton, has he been playing?
|
|
|
Post by Neshead on Oct 20, 2017 17:24:45 GMT
Dunno, they've not stopped laughing at Ladbrokes when i asked them.
|
|
|
Post by Hobhead on Oct 20, 2017 17:26:55 GMT
Dunno, they've not stopped laughing at Ladbrokes when i asked them. Clarke to score first (or last) and Charlton to win 4-1 is 200/1.
|
|
|
Post by Neshead on Oct 20, 2017 17:28:11 GMT
Dunno, they've not stopped laughing at Ladbrokes when i asked them. Clarke to score first (or last) and Charlton to win 4-1 is 200/1. Fuck it, i'm all in. It's written in the stars or summat.
|
|
|
Post by Lethal Jizzle on Oct 20, 2017 17:28:41 GMT
Not sure on us conceding 4 but the rest will happen. Seriously have no enthusiasm for this game
|
|
|
Post by Lofty on Oct 20, 2017 17:29:45 GMT
I've got a tenner on Charlton (Draw no bet) at 11/8.
We've got injuries, they're decent, nailed on defeat.
|
|
|
Post by Hobhead on Oct 20, 2017 17:30:50 GMT
Has Clarke been getting on at Charlton, has he been playing? Last I saw the Charlton fans were 'pleasantly surprised'. That said, remember what he was like in his first season with us? He was unplayable at times.
|
|
|
Post by Nice boy on Oct 20, 2017 17:33:45 GMT
Has Clarke been getting on at Charlton, has he been playing? Last I saw the Charlton fans were 'pleasantly surprised'. That said, remember what he was like in his first season with us? He was unplayable at times. Billy Clarke was brilliant during his first season with us. I remember him scoring quite a few aswell. He was too inconsistent afterwards. He's one of those players who good when on song but lacked the composure in front of goal.
|
|
|
Post by Lofty on Oct 20, 2017 17:36:18 GMT
I'll never forgive him for Wembley.
|
|
|
Post by Lethal Jizzle on Oct 20, 2017 17:40:55 GMT
Think you're all getting carried away here, he was an Eoin Jess type who occasionally showed glimpses of the skill he had. Got a fair return first season but went missing more often than Not, then after his injury he was just garbage
|
|
|
Post by Hobhead on Oct 20, 2017 17:43:31 GMT
Think you're all getting carried away here, he was an Eoin Jess type who occasionally showed glimpses of the skill he had. Got a fair return first season but went missing more often than Not, then after his injury he was just garbage I thought he was quality in his first season but it was all downhill from there. Didn't he score about sixteen goals or so that season?
|
|
|
Post by Nice boy on Oct 20, 2017 17:45:23 GMT
Think you're all getting carried away here, he was an Eoin Jess type who occasionally showed glimpses of the skill he had. Got a fair return first season but went missing more often than Not, then after his injury he was just garbage I thought he was quality in his first season but it was all downhill from there. Didn't he score about sixteen goals or so that season? 14 I think.
|
|
|
Post by Hobhead on Oct 20, 2017 17:49:44 GMT
I thought he was quality in his first season but it was all downhill from there. Didn't he score about sixteen goals or so that season? 14 I think. Not a bad return. For me Billy Clarke's biggest problem is his position. This 'in-the-hole- business is incongruous in League One. He lacks the finishing to play as a genuine forward and can't win headers or tackle which rules him out of centre midfield. You end up having to alter your formation to find a place for him so if he's off his game it stands out more than it would for pretty much everybody else with the possible exception of the 'keeper. For League One I'd keep it simple and play 4-4-2 wherever possible. Overthinking the game at this level is rife and it's one of McCall's biggest weaknesses.
|
|
|
Post by Neshead on Oct 20, 2017 17:51:00 GMT
Think you're all getting carried away here, he was an Eoin Jess type who occasionally showed glimpses of the skill he had. Got a fair return first season but went missing more often than Not, then after his injury he was just garbage I thought he was quality in his first season but it was all downhill from there. Didn't he score about sixteen goals or so that season? Looked very good when not paired with Hanson. Go figure.
|
|
|
Post by Nice boy on Oct 20, 2017 17:54:30 GMT
Not a bad return. For me Billy Clarke's biggest problem is his position. This 'in-the-hole- business is incongruous in League One. He lacks the finishing to play as a genuine forward and can't win headers or tackle which rules him out of centre midfield. You end up having to alter your formation to find a place for him so if he's off his game it stands out more than it would for pretty much everybody else with the possible exception of the 'keeper. For League One I'd keep it simple and play 4-4-2 wherever possible. Overthinking the game at this level is rife and it's one of McCall's biggest weaknesses. Spot on. He's the type of player who is quite hard to accommodate, even when he's playing well. It makes you wonder why we spent 200k on a similar type of player in Mcarten. What system would he play in which would also allow us to get the best out of Wyke? The one thing you can't do is leave Wyke isolated, which is the risk you run when you play so someone in 'in the hole'.
|
|
|
Post by Neshead on Oct 20, 2017 17:58:09 GMT
Not a bad return. For me Billy Clarke's biggest problem is his position. This 'in-the-hole- business is incongruous in League One. He lacks the finishing to play as a genuine forward and can't win headers or tackle which rules him out of centre midfield. You end up having to alter your formation to find a place for him so if he's off his game it stands out more than it would for pretty much everybody else with the possible exception of the 'keeper. For League One I'd keep it simple and play 4-4-2 wherever possible. Overthinking the game at this level is rife and it's one of McCall's biggest weaknesses. Spot on. He's the type of player who is quite hard to accommodate, even when he's playing well. It makes you wonder why we spent 200k on a similar type of player in Mcarten. What system would he play in which would also allow us to get the best out of Wyke? The one thing you can't do is leave Wyke isolated, which is the risk you run when you play so someone in 'in the hole'. You have a player like Wyke, the team builds around him. Wyke thrives on crosses in the box. If as it could be that we don't have Taylor, Gilliead, Chicksen or McMahon playing, Wyke may as well borrow the trains loungepants and sit at home and watch Soccer saturday.
|
|
|
Post by Train (F-2547) on Oct 20, 2017 22:55:40 GMT
I'll never forgive him for Wembley. It was the keepers fault for saving it you tit.
|
|