|
Post by Hobhead on Mar 9, 2024 14:36:10 GMT
I’m starting to think Alexander doesn’t have a clue what he’s doing.
|
|
|
Post by Mossley Bantam on Mar 9, 2024 14:38:31 GMT
Stubbs must be injured right?
Wilson, though I don't think he's generally good enough, did well on Tuesday night against Donny after coming on so it's odd to see him completely binned.
Weird selection. Again.
|
|
|
Post by Dick on Mar 9, 2024 15:11:02 GMT
If any player didn't deserve another start then it would have been Wright. Lot of convincing to do and he sounds shite already.
|
|
|
Post by Dick on Mar 9, 2024 15:15:23 GMT
Well. Shut my mouth.
Shushing the Accrington hordes is a bit of a 'ooo you're hard' move tho.
|
|
|
Post by Hoochy on Mar 9, 2024 20:15:09 GMT
That was a really good performance. Granted, Stanley were poor but we looked creative and threatening. Nice to see us mixing it up with some direct stuff but also some nice wing play, through balls, overlaps. Positive signs.
|
|
|
Post by Lethal Jizzle on Mar 9, 2024 20:22:41 GMT
They were shite we punished them, struggled with the wind a bit 2nd half but why are people saying Ridehalgh played well? He wasn't as abysmal as usual but he was no more than a 5/10, which is pretty good for him.
On a side note Tomkinson is looking van dijk esque and is a cut above this level
|
|
|
Post by hobbes on Mar 9, 2024 21:48:17 GMT
They were shite we punished them, struggled with the wind a bit 2nd half but why are people saying Ridehalgh played well? He wasn't as abysmal as usual but he was no more than a 5/10, which is pretty good for him. On a side note Tomkinson is looking van dyke esque and is a cut above this level Dick Van Dyke?
|
|
|
Post by Neshead on Mar 10, 2024 10:56:27 GMT
They were shite we punished them, struggled with the wind a bit 2nd half but why are people saying Ridehalgh played well? He wasn't as abysmal as usual but he was no more than a 5/10, which is pretty good for him. On a side note Tomkinson is looking van dijk esque and is a cut above this level Tomkinson clearly better than league 2, unfortunately that means we must bid farewell at the end of the season. A 3-0 win is always welcome but as always it should be looked at in context. That Stanley side should be bottom 2, luckily for them they have points on the board.
|
|
|
Post by Dick on Mar 10, 2024 13:00:52 GMT
They were shite we punished them, struggled with the wind a bit 2nd half but why are people saying Ridehalgh played well? He wasn't as abysmal as usual but he was no more than a 5/10, which is pretty good for him. On a side note Tomkinson is looking van dijk esque and is a cut above this level Tomkinson clearly better than league 2, unfortunately that means we must bid farewell at the end of the season. A 3-0 win is always welcome but as always it should be looked at in context. That Stanley side should be bottom 2, luckily for them they have points on the board. Remember when we took a financial gamble signing Andrew Davies and it paid off, tenfold? We should be doing be doing what we can to make Tomkinson a permanent signing in a similar manner. Great potential and if we go up at some point that value would greatly increase. If, and if we go up this year we should be making him a priority signing. But no, we're the sustainable club, where money made, mostly from the fans, is just to keep the lights. Gloop is never going to invest in anything that would actually benefit or improve this club. No intention, absolutely zero interest or thought in trying to sign any of the decent loanees we've had over the last few years who could carry the club forward and have resale potential.
|
|
|
Post by Bacon on Mar 11, 2024 11:52:12 GMT
Tomkinson clearly better than league 2, unfortunately that means we must bid farewell at the end of the season. A 3-0 win is always welcome but as always it should be looked at in context. That Stanley side should be bottom 2, luckily for them they have points on the board. Remember when we took a financial gamble signing Andrew Davies and it paid off, tenfold? We should be doing be doing what we can to make Tomkinson a permanent signing in a similar manner. Great potential and if we go up at some point that value would greatly increase. If, and if we go up this year we should be making him a priority signing. But no, we're the sustainable club, where money made, mostly from the fans, is just to keep the lights. Gloop is never going to invest in anything that would actually benefit or improve this club. No intention, absolutely zero interest or thought in trying to sign any of the decent loanees we've had over the last few years who could carry the club forward and have resale potential. We don't need to sign them, we let other people get them, realise they're no good then we re-loan them.
|
|