|
Post by moshimoshi on Nov 24, 2018 19:59:47 GMT
Why did those leftist nonces cancel the flyover???
|
|
|
Post by Hobhead on Nov 24, 2018 20:04:40 GMT
Why did those leftist nonces cancel the flyover??? Somebody got to Butterfield, told him Edin was done and settled the bill.
|
|
|
Post by moshimoshi on Nov 24, 2018 21:21:00 GMT
Why did those leftist nonces cancel the flyover??? Somebody got to Butterfield, told him Edin was done and settled the bill. Weird. I signed up to BT with a burner email using a VPN. Started asking the real questions about it. I was promptly banned. They’ve now changed the sign up process to manually approved new users, preventing me from further questioning. Something is going on and it is not good, the cows arse could truly be the last bastion of integrity in this field. Everyone’s for edin out but I feel old Rupp isn’t too thrilled with his role in this pantomime and has made his feelings known to certain parts of the community, personally or by proxy. Chapter 2 may not be any brighter than what weve suffered so far.
|
|
claw
Hot Water Tank Bantam
Posts: 713
|
Post by claw on Nov 25, 2018 14:32:20 GMT
That Bingley Bantams bloke has gone up to number 2 in my list of doylums.
|
|
|
Post by moshimoshi on Nov 25, 2018 15:02:20 GMT
That Bingley Bantams bloke has gone up to number 2 in my list of doylums. It’s quite funny really. Travel group that are in cahoots with the regime convince the organiser to cancel at the very last minute but had been working toward it for days. Now they’re all congratulating each other on how they’ve made a difference. The only difference is they’ve been made to look mugs and are collectively 900 quid or so lighter.
|
|
|
Post by Hobhead on Nov 25, 2018 15:16:49 GMT
Bingley Bantams have been some of the more stubborn clinkers hanging around Edin's arse. Now that chump is claiming he's got the inside track on Edin's demise - they're Edin's lackeys and I wouldn't believe a single word they said.
On the plus side though, if Edin's had them over then the meltdown will be glorious.
|
|
|
Post by fish on Nov 25, 2018 17:20:39 GMT
That tosspot is full of shit. Are we expected to believe a fucking flyover could have "financial damage" on the club? Seriously, what a load of shite. And any investor only needs to read social media or look at stuff done by WOAP and sky sports to know what a fuckfest edin has made us.
There's no way anyone at the club has or is going to pay 800 quid out of their own pockets to refund the fans for this.
Our fans are so fucking gullible it's untrue, edin wins yet again and when he's still incharge in a few weeks, TCA will be there to say we told you so. Cunts.
Edin out.
|
|
|
Post by Lethal Jizzle on Nov 25, 2018 17:30:54 GMT
That tosspot is full of shit. Are we expected to believe a fucking flyover could have "financial damage" on the club? Seriously, what a load of shite. And any investor only needs to read social media or look at stuff done by WOAP and sky sports to know what a fuckfest edin has made us. There's no way anyone at the club has or is going to pay 800 quid out of their own pockets to refund the fans for this. Our fans are so fucking gullible it's untrue, edin wins yet again and when he's still incharge in a few weeks, TCA will be there to say we told you so. Cunts. Edin out. I would have asked for a bank transfer and proof of new investor before any cancellation. The arrival of captain admin has made everyone go fucking soft already. Just because he's a city fan ( despite being a Leeds fan for many years) people think he's some sort of saviour. Fuck that he made a right abortion of everything till Lawn came in and saved his arse
|
|
|
Post by benitocarbone on Nov 25, 2018 21:59:23 GMT
Can someone summarise what’s being said over there so that I don’t have to sift through 20 odd pages?
Is the jist that the flyover was cancelled because someone convinced Butterfield that Edin is gone anyway and that any flyover would put potential new investment at risk?
|
|
|
Post by rahicscissorbudget on Nov 25, 2018 22:27:51 GMT
Can someone summarise what’s being said over there so that I don’t have to sift through 20 odd pages? Is the jist that the flyover was cancelled because someone convinced Butterfield that Edin is gone anyway and that any flyover would put potential new investment at risk? Seconded.
|
|
|
Post by moshimoshi on Nov 25, 2018 22:38:37 GMT
Can someone summarise what’s being said over there so that I don’t have to sift through 20 odd pages? Is the jist that the flyover was cancelled because someone convinced Butterfield that Edin is gone anyway and that any flyover would put potential new investment at risk? That’s pretty much it, potentially putting off a new investor. The club used its propaganda arm Bingley bantams to pass on the concerns. No one has said who is returning the money lost, but someone is. Allegedly. If there’s no news tomorrow the theory that the bingerz travel club were asked to try and save edin embarrassment in front of his 20 mates from Stuttgart will surely gather pace. Still seems odd they took them out for a night on the tiles on Friday. All come out in the wash eventually.
|
|
stevayb
Hot Water Tank Bantam
Posts: 350
|
Post by stevayb on Nov 25, 2018 22:40:19 GMT
Bingley bantams were contacted by someone at the club apparently explaining why it would harm the club if it went ahead (after already being aware of it being planned for weeks) as it could hurt a potential investment (because whatever cunt investing is scared of planes advertising against cancer). Bingley bantams get jon to cancel at such short notice that all money is lost, with a vague promise that it will be paid back (which doesn't appear to be forthcoming).
Other than that a lot of words with little substance. Apparently we're knobs for not just accepting what Bingley bantams are suddenly spewing out despite them being up Edins arse for the previous 2 years.
|
|
|
Post by rahicscissorbudget on Nov 25, 2018 22:40:39 GMT
Can someone summarise what’s being said over there so that I don’t have to sift through 20 odd pages? Is the jist that the flyover was cancelled because someone convinced Butterfield that Edin is gone anyway and that any flyover would put potential new investment at risk? That’s pretty much it, potentially putting off a new investor. The club used its propaganda arm Bingley bantams to pass on the concerns. No one has said who is returning the money lost, but someone is. Allegedly. If there’s no news tomorrow the theory that the bingerz travel club were asked to try and save edin embarrassment in front of his 20 mates from Stuttgart will surely gather pace. Still seems odd they took them out for a night on the tiles on Friday. All come out in the wash eventually. who took who out? Stop using so many pronouns.
|
|
stevayb
Hot Water Tank Bantam
Posts: 350
|
Post by stevayb on Nov 25, 2018 22:42:07 GMT
Just to add our fan groups are a fucking joke. Supporters trust are a sham and Bingley bantams are just the fuhrers propaganda arm. Aren't fan groups supposed to represent the fans rather than protect a fuckwit running the club into the ground?
|
|
|
Post by benitocarbone on Nov 25, 2018 22:47:30 GMT
Can someone summarise what’s being said over there so that I don’t have to sift through 20 odd pages? Is the jist that the flyover was cancelled because someone convinced Butterfield that Edin is gone anyway and that any flyover would put potential new investment at risk? That’s pretty much it, potentially putting off a new investor. The club used its propaganda arm Bingley bantams to pass on the concerns. No one has said who is returning the money lost, but someone is. Allegedly. If there’s no news tomorrow the theory that the bingerz travel club were asked to try and save edin embarrassment in front of his 20 mates from Stuttgart will surely gather pace. Still seems odd they took them out for a night on the tiles on Friday. All come out in the wash eventually. New investment would be nice and it sounds like it’s needed but honestly all I really care about is getting that fucker out of our club and I’m praying to God that any announcement this week is to that effect.
|
|
|
Post by Hobhead on Nov 26, 2018 7:28:42 GMT
Can someone summarise what’s being said over there so that I don’t have to sift through 20 odd pages? Is the jist that the flyover was cancelled because someone convinced Butterfield that Edin is gone anyway and that any flyover would put potential new investment at risk? It’s even better than that. Edin had twenty friends over from Germany for the game and Bingley Bantams were responsible for entertaining them on the Friday night by taking them on the piss in Bingley. So we have a line of communication from the club (Edin) and twenty friends that a flyover would be embarrassing in front of. Now, in a completely separate incident, another unnamed agent acting for the club also got in touch with Bingley Bantams to ask that the flyover be cancelled because it might put off a potential investor. Two phone calls from seperate persons to the same supporters organisation on/for the same weekend. It’s an extraordinary coincidence that the club and Edin both contacted the same supporters group on the same weekend with seperate requests for help. The entertaining Edin’s pals makes sense but using BB as an intermediary to cancel the flyover? Nah. Edin didn’t want his pals to see a plane with a banner demanding he leaves so he got his staunchest nuthuggers to do his dirty work and get it postponed and BB complied. Bingley Bantams are actively working for Edin and against supporters. Assume the brace position, lads, the fallout from this will be biblical.
|
|
|
Post by Hobhead on Nov 26, 2018 7:44:22 GMT
Also consider that the club (Edin) could have easily reached Butterfield themselves by signing up an account at BT or simply using one of the accounts they already have. Bingley Bantams gave the request that extra dash of authenticity and added an extra layer between Edin and culpability.
New investor? It had to be a third party. Edin’s had Butterfield here.
Someone at BB has crawled so far up Edin’s fartpipe thry csn floss his teeth from the inside and I wouldn’t look much further than City-since-67.
|
|
|
Post by Hobhead on Nov 26, 2018 8:13:38 GMT
Another good point by Bantamsteve over on BT is why would anyone organise the visit of a potential investor for a game when neither of the two shareholders were present?
Edin has fucked everyone over here and anyone who’s a member of Bingley Bantams needs to cancel their membership post haste and join the Shippers. Or better still, re-form Wilsden Bantams and get a bit of integrity back.
|
|
|
Post by You can't beat a double dip on Nov 26, 2018 16:24:11 GMT
I can confirm this had nothing to do with Edin.. The request to get in touch regards cancelling the flyover came direct from a non German employee of the club. The fans flying over from Stuttgart rang the club Friday morning as they hadn't heard from Mr I know Football.. So it was arranged last minute for BB to take them out..
Fully appreciate you might not believe me, however that is what happened!
|
|
|
Post by Neshead on Nov 26, 2018 16:32:43 GMT
I can confirm this had nothing to do with Edin.. The request to get in touch regards cancelling the flyover came direct from a non German employee of the club. The fans flying over from Stuttgart rang the club Friday morning as they hadn't heard from Mr I know Football.. So it was arranged last minute for BB to take them out.. Fully appreciate you might not believe me, however that is what happened! Come on don’t tease. Who was it?
|
|