|
Post by Hobhead on Jul 24, 2017 19:21:30 GMT
The ridiculous thing about that picture is that the sign says 'periods are not just for women', but it's a woman holding the sign thus proving that periods are for women after all. Only in that person's head are they not a woman. Expecting everybody else to join in with her biology-denying fantasy is ridiculous (she expects everybody to use the pronouns they/them when referring to her). She might believe she's not a woman but the plain fact of the matter is that she is and it's deluded to think that having a public period is anything other than counter-productive in her quest to be recognised as not being female. I don't get the point of what she's trying to achieve? It's nothing a pack of tampons can't fix? Are gender fluids prohibited from buying pons? I suspect she's trying to prove that 'men' have periods too. A world where the gender waters are completely and utterly muddied would suit a woman who thinks she's a menstruating man just fine.
|
|
|
Post by Train (F-2547) on Jul 24, 2017 19:25:43 GMT
I don't get the point of what she's trying to achieve? It's nothing a pack of tampons can't fix? Are gender fluids prohibited from buying pons? I suspect she's trying to prove that 'men' have periods too. A world where the gender waters are completely and utterly muddied would suit a woman who thinks she's a menstruating man just fine. 😂😂😂
|
|
|
Post by billycasper on Jul 24, 2017 19:25:44 GMT
The liberal left trying to instill their warped world into mine. Fucks me off royally I have to explain this shit to my kids. Sick to death of the "minority" pushing their ideology onto me.
It's always about men and women, there's no in between.
Hindley & Brady Posh & Becks Renee & Ronato Mr Venus Williams and her brother Serena.
I've just about got my head around blokes liking sausage.
|
|
|
Post by Hobhead on Jul 24, 2017 19:31:29 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Nice boy on Jul 24, 2017 19:34:08 GMT
I get that, I just don't agree with the notion that they are attention seeking or that they should "just pick one", which are some of the views shared in this thread. Perhaps the initial phase of confusion about gender isn't attention-seeking but demanding specific pronouns from everyone you interact with and expecting the whole world to recognise each and every gender as fact as and when it's invented (seventy one at the last count) is, and it's patently ridiculous. It requires a fair amount of effort from everyone they interact with in order that their delicate sensibilities aren't knocked out of kilter therefore it attracts attention and they have a whole host of derogatory terms for people who aren't prepared to play ball which equals more attention. In the end it's quite likely that all they'll end up achieving is bitter, misunderstood alienation and entertaining their fantasies is only going to help them get there. Personally speaking, I don't recognise their made up genders and think it's a bag of bullshit. I totally get what you're saying in the first 2 paragraphs. The only part i disagree with is the last sentence. Something which isn't in their control can't be "bullshit". It's only bullshit if they choose to switch between man and women for attention or "a bit of fun" and not because they are wired in such a way where they can't help but feel the way they do.
|
|
|
Post by Hobhead on Jul 24, 2017 19:37:08 GMT
Perhaps the initial phase of confusion about gender isn't attention-seeking but demanding specific pronouns from everyone you interact with and expecting the whole world to recognise each and every gender as fact as and when it's invented (seventy one at the last count) is, and it's patently ridiculous. It requires a fair amount of effort from everyone they interact with in order that their delicate sensibilities aren't knocked out of kilter therefore it attracts attention and they have a whole host of derogatory terms for people who aren't prepared to play ball which equals more attention. In the end it's quite likely that all they'll end up achieving is bitter, misunderstood alienation and entertaining their fantasies is only going to help them get there. Personally speaking, I don't recognise their made up genders and think it's a bag of bullshit. I totally get what you're saying in the first 2 paragraphs. The only part i disagree with is the last sentence. Something which isn't in their control can't be "bullshit". It's only bullshit if they choose to switch between man and women for attention or "a bit of fun" and not because they are wired in such a way where they can't help but feel the way they do. By bullshit I mean having no basis in fact. I fully accept that they believe what they are saying to be real. Their belief doesn't come close to meeting the required level of biological proof required for me (and I suspect many others) to accept their belief as hard, scientific fact.
|
|
|
Post by Neshead on Jul 24, 2017 19:42:58 GMT
God created Adam and Eve, not Adam and Steve.- Alan Partridge.
|
|
|
Post by Train (F-2547) on Jul 24, 2017 19:43:23 GMT
I totally get what you're saying in the first 2 paragraphs. The only part i disagree with is the last sentence. Something which isn't in their control can't be "bullshit". It's only bullshit if they choose to switch between man and women for attention or "a bit of fun" and not because they are wired in such a way where they can't help but feel the way they do. By bullshit I mean having no basis in fact. I fully accept that they believe what they are saying to be real. Their belief doesn't come close to meeting the required level of biological proof required for me (and I suspect many others) to accept their belief as hard, scientific fact. You don't accept that I'm a train? 😢
|
|
|
Post by Neshead on Jul 24, 2017 19:55:54 GMT
The bloke who turned into a woman talked a lot of sense. Also measured high on the fuckability scale.
|
|
|
Post by Train (F-2547) on Jul 24, 2017 20:20:51 GMT
Got the first 15 mins watched, how polite is Canadian debate? Half the problem stems from the guy teaching trans studies or whatever it was! He gets paid to peddle that trip? Scientists for over 50 years have said there's more than two genders? Really?
|
|
|
Post by Train (F-2547) on Jul 24, 2017 21:42:29 GMT
Right just watched all that and my conclusions are as follows.
Professor faggot - dangerous, shouldn't be teaching young adults. His idea that everybody can be cuddled and accepted is a lovely principal but when uni ends and those kids are spat out into wider society they will lack the basic skills to get anywhere. grade F
He she author - didn't bring much to the table fairly harmless though. Grade D
The lawyer bloke - debated with himself massively over getting in a debate and then proceeded to sit on the fence for an hour. Grade E
YouTube he she - to paraphrase her contribution "I'm sick of all these cunts bitching about trans problems, stop labelling yourselves as more and more outrageous things and fucking get on with you lives" grade C+
Professor free speech - dunno, kind of got his jist kind of thought he was off on a bit of a tangent at times. Seems to have ultimate conviction in his beliefs and would bum a pro non binary type in a debate I'd reckon. Grade C-
They were all (with the exception of the queer professor) very polite and well mannered.
|
|
|
Post by Attentive Onlooker on Jul 24, 2017 21:48:25 GMT
Right just watched all that and my conclusions are as follows. Professor faggot - dangerous, shouldn't be teaching young adults. His idea that everybody can be cuddled and accepted is a lovely principal but when uni ends and those kids are spat out into wider society they will lack the basic skills to get anywhere. grade F He she author - didn't bring much to the table fairly harmless though. Grade D The lawyer bloke - debated with himself massively over getting in a debate and then proceeded to sit on the fence for an hour. Grade E YouTube he she - to paraphrase her contribution "I'm sick of all these cunts bitching about trans problems, stop labelling yourselves as more and more outrageous things and fucking get on with you lives" grade C+ Professor free speech - dunno, kind of got his jist kind of thought he was off on a bit of a tangent at times. Seems to have ultimate conviction in his beliefs and would bum a pro non binary type in a debate I'd reckon. Grade C- They were all (with the exception of the queer professor) very polite and well mannered. Have you ever been described as a right on liberal?
|
|
|
Post by Train (F-2547) on Jul 24, 2017 21:50:13 GMT
Right just watched all that and my conclusions are as follows. Professor faggot - dangerous, shouldn't be teaching young adults. His idea that everybody can be cuddled and accepted is a lovely principal but when uni ends and those kids are spat out into wider society they will lack the basic skills to get anywhere. grade F He she author - didn't bring much to the table fairly harmless though. Grade D The lawyer bloke - debated with himself massively over getting in a debate and then proceeded to sit on the fence for an hour. Grade E YouTube he she - to paraphrase her contribution "I'm sick of all these cunts bitching about trans problems, stop labelling yourselves as more and more outrageous things and fucking get on with you lives" grade C+ Professor free speech - dunno, kind of got his jist kind of thought he was off on a bit of a tangent at times. Seems to have ultimate conviction in his beliefs and would bum a pro non binary type in a debate I'd reckon. Grade C- They were all (with the exception of the queer professor) very polite and well mannered. Have you ever been described as a right on liberal? A right on liberal? Care to expand caller?
|
|
|
Post by Hobhead on Jul 28, 2017 17:43:43 GMT
There's far too many unfeeling people out there who need to think before they speak:
|
|
|
Post by Lofty on Jul 28, 2017 17:50:18 GMT
There's far too many unfeeling people out there who need to think before they speak: People are just plain fucking nuts.
|
|
|
Post by Neshead on Jul 28, 2017 18:12:43 GMT
There's far too many unfeeling people out there who need to think before they speak: The sort of woman who would be offended by you punching her in the cunt because that day she felt gender fluidity that day so didn't have a cunt.
|
|
|
Post by billycasper on Jul 28, 2017 18:17:50 GMT
How the fuck do you decide if they need a rubella jab or not?
|
|
|
Post by Neshead on Jul 28, 2017 18:25:04 GMT
How the fuck do you decide if they need a rubella jab or not? Cock or cunt?
|
|
|
Post by billycasper on Jul 28, 2017 18:52:02 GMT
How the fuck do you decide if they need a rubella jab or not? Cock or cunt? I'd jab the cunt in the cock with it
|
|
|
Post by northernmonkey on Jul 28, 2017 20:15:05 GMT
There's far too many unfeeling people out there who need to think before they speak: Hitler did some really bad shit but if I ran the country they'd be calling me NorthernHitler within a week. I mean, what else is there for these cunts other than the gas chamber? Even then, which fucking shower do I put them in without offending them?
|
|