|
Post by mikehunt on Apr 23, 2019 20:47:08 GMT
an anti playing squad message will do the trick and focus rupps mind on where he needs to be spending his Deutsche Marks. PLAYERS OUT, PLAYERS ARE A DISGRACE, O CONNORS MUM IS A BENDER are all worthy suggestions. OI JOSHY, MARK TOOK YER MISSUS UP THE WRONG UN. I'd pay for that. You’d pay to take Josh’s missus up the Gary Glitter? Fair play, not sure she’d be up for it though.
|
|
edinho1
Bantam Talk Bantam
Posts: 2
|
Post by edinho1 on Apr 24, 2019 0:08:30 GMT
It's not his fault. The money he has provided should have been plenty for a promotion push.
Instead it was pissed up the wall by our Edin (Hopkins January business was also expensive but shite)
|
|
|
Post by Hobhead on Apr 24, 2019 7:05:49 GMT
It's not his fault. The money he has provided should have been plenty for a promotion push. Instead it was pissed up the wall by our Edin (Hopkins January business was also expensive but shite) That January was a mess. Right when we needed to get our shit together we do what we always do and compound other fuck ups. The Billy Clarke signing bothers me. Why did we spend money on a player we didn’t need but who also happens to be an ex player who hasn’t moved out of the area and was doubly keen to come back? Was this really a HopkinS signing or was it Rhodes doing a Rahic?
|
|
|
Post by Train (F-2547) on Apr 24, 2019 7:18:04 GMT
It's not his fault. The money he has provided should have been plenty for a promotion push. Instead it was pissed up the wall by our Edin (Hopkins January business was also expensive but shite) That January was a mess. Right when we needed to get our shit together we do what we always do and compound other fuck ups. The Billy Clarke signing bothers me. Why did we spend money on a player we didn’t need but who also happens to be an ex player who hasn’t moved out of the area and was doubly keen to come back? Was this really a HopkinS signing or was it Rhodes doing a Rahic? It literally made no sense. Nobody looked at that team and thought yeah we need a billy Clarke
|
|
|
Post by Dennis on Apr 24, 2019 7:24:56 GMT
It's not his fault. The money he has provided should have been plenty for a promotion push. Instead it was pissed up the wall by our Edin (Hopkins January business was also expensive but shite) That January was a mess. Right when we needed to get our shit together we do what we always do and compound other fuck ups. The Billy Clarke signing bothers me. Why did we spend money on a player we didn’t need but who also happens to be an ex player who hasn’t moved out of the area and was doubly keen to come back? Was this really a HopkinS signing or was it Rhodes doing a Rahic? It was bizarre. Hopkin announced the kind of players he wanted prior to the transfer window opening including a 'wide man' and a striker. We finished the transfer window without the wide man, with no additional striker but a clutch of additional central midfielders - Andersen, Butterfield and Clarke -to sit alongside the loanees - Payne and O'Brien - whose loans were extended. Either Hopkin changed his mind on what he needed or he couldn't attract who he wanted to the club or he was overruled . And two weeks after the window closed, Hopkin was leaving VP. My money is on the 3rd option.
|
|
|
Post by Hobhead on Apr 24, 2019 15:08:19 GMT
That January was a mess. Right when we needed to get our shit together we do what we always do and compound other fuck ups. The Billy Clarke signing bothers me. Why did we spend money on a player we didn’t need but who also happens to be an ex player who hasn’t moved out of the area and was doubly keen to come back? Was this really a HopkinS signing or was it Rhodes doing a Rahic? It was bizarre. Hopkin announced the kind of players he wanted prior to the transfer window opening including a 'wide man' and a striker. We finished the transfer window without the wide man, with no additional striker but a clutch of additional central midfielders - Andersen, Butterfield and Clarke -to sit alongside the loanees - Payne and O'Brien - whose loans were extended. Either Hopkin changed his mind on what he needed or he couldn't attract who he wanted to the club or he was overruled . And two weeks after the window closed, Hopkin was leaving VP. My money is on the 3rd option. Wages for mates. Charity for old pals. And we’re going down.
|
|
|
Post by moshimoshi on Apr 24, 2019 18:02:38 GMT
It's not his fault. The money he has provided should have been plenty for a promotion push. Instead it was pissed up the wall by our Edin (Hopkins January business was also expensive but shite) That January was a mess. Right when we needed to get our shit together we do what we always do and compound other fuck ups. The Billy Clarke signing bothers me. Why did we spend money on a player we didn’t need but who also happens to be an ex player who hasn’t moved out of the area and was doubly keen to come back? Was this really a HopkinS signing or was it Rhodes doing a Rahic? Charlton wanted rid so were likely shopping him about, by all accounts we didn’t pay for him and just took over his contract. We were desperate for players and no one wanted to sign up. Probably even did it on his old wage. In other news you’ve all gone soft, the summer will see a lack of positive investment and Rupp will continue to talk shit about deficits and shortfalls and we’ll embark on a underwhelming League 2 campaign that could fold the club completely should we go down again. All the while there’ll be some gomp based mockery, lots of moaning, folk blaming Edin, Rhodes and Abbo whilst the money man quietly goes about his business- I.e not giving a fuck about the club. The cheerleader wannabe board members in that whaler twat will be in full chorous talking about the long term, and reassuring us all how Rupps just about doing his damdest to sort us out. We’re fucked.
|
|
|
Post by Bacon on Apr 25, 2019 11:52:39 GMT
That January was a mess. Right when we needed to get our shit together we do what we always do and compound other fuck ups. The Billy Clarke signing bothers me. Why did we spend money on a player we didn’t need but who also happens to be an ex player who hasn’t moved out of the area and was doubly keen to come back? Was this really a HopkinS signing or was it Rhodes doing a Rahic? Charlton wanted rid so were likely shopping him about, by all accounts we didn’t pay for him and just took over his contract. We were desperate for players and no one wanted to sign up. Probably even did it on his old wage. In other news you’ve all gone soft, the summer will see a lack of positive investment and Rupp will continue to talk shit about deficits and shortfalls and we’ll embark on a underwhelming League 2 campaign that could fold the club completely should we go down again. All the while there’ll be some gomp based mockery, lots of moaning, folk blaming Edin, Rhodes and Abbo whilst the money man quietly goes about his business- I.e not giving a fuck about the club. The cheerleader wannabe board members in that whaler twat will be in full chorous talking about the long term, and reassuring us all how Rupps just about doing his damdest to sort us out. We’re fucked. You need to try just getting behind the lads for fucks sake.
|
|