Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 2, 2017 16:41:01 GMT
Team ??
I know he won't but I'd like to see Sattelmeir keep his place, back four picks itself as does the front 2. Midfield is always the problem but hopefully Gilliead Cullen Vincelot(hopefully just needed a rest after a drop in form) Marshall.
I'd be confident of taking a 2 goal lead to their place with that team
|
|
|
Post by Lofty on May 2, 2017 16:42:20 GMT
GK Doyle
RB McMahon LB Mezza CB Rory CB KNP
CM Cullen CM Vince
AM Clarke
RW Marshy LW Gilly
CF Wyke
That is assuming Jones is injured, if he isn't he replaces Clarke and we go 2 up top.
2-0 City
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 2, 2017 16:44:28 GMT
Meeeeeeeerrrrrrrrggggggggggeeee
|
|
|
Post by Hobhead on May 2, 2017 16:44:28 GMT
I read in the T&A earlier that Jones may well be fit. Sounds risky. I'm not sure we should gamble our best forward (who's been a shining light from minute one by the way) if he's fragile in any way when there might be another two games for him to continue being outstanding in.
|
|
|
Post by Lofty on May 2, 2017 16:53:41 GMT
I merged two threads. Genius.
|
|
|
Post by Hobhead on May 2, 2017 16:56:14 GMT
I merged two threads. Genius. Finally, hope for the future.
|
|
|
Post by Nice boy on May 2, 2017 17:17:38 GMT
The only changes I'll make from our usual starting line up is Hiwula in for Jones (if he's injured) and Gillihead in for Law.
|
|
|
Post by Hobhead on May 2, 2017 17:20:12 GMT
The only changes I'll make from our usual starting line up is Hiwula in for Jones (if he's injured) and Gillihead in for Law. Sticking with Doyle?
|
|
|
Post by Nice boy on May 2, 2017 17:25:30 GMT
The only changes I'll make from our usual starting line up is Hiwula in for Jones (if he's injured) and Gillihead in for Law. Sticking with Doyle? I wouldn't mind Satellmier coming in as I don't actually rate Doyle but A)it's not realistic, no way will McCall drop Doyle B)it's too risky at this stage, ideally you would have liked Sattelmier to have played a few more games before throwing him into the deep end for such a huge game.
|
|
|
Post by Hobhead on May 2, 2017 17:29:32 GMT
I wouldn't mind Satellmier coming in as I don't actually rate Doyle but A)it's not realistic, no way will McCall drop Doyle B)it's too risky at this stage, ideally you would have liked Sattelmier to have played a few more games before throwing him into the deep end for such a huge game. True on all counts. I'd love to see Sattelmaier given a run though as I reckon he looks pretty promising from the little I've seen.
|
|
|
Post by Ricc on May 2, 2017 17:37:22 GMT
Doyle Don't call me Vince Mezza NKP Row z Rory Law Cullen Vincelot Marshall Clarke Wyke
|
|
|
Post by Train (F-2547) on May 2, 2017 19:52:27 GMT
Doyle Meredith McMahon Nkp Rory
Marshall Cullen Vincelot Gillead
Jones Wyke
0-3
tickets spare for everyone
|
|
|
Post by Hoochy on May 2, 2017 20:43:42 GMT
I'm sticking my neck out and predicting a draw.
|
|
|
Post by Lofty on May 2, 2017 20:53:37 GMT
I'm sticking my neck out and predicting a draw. I'd be happy with a draw or at the very least 2 points.
|
|
|
Post by Neshead on May 2, 2017 20:59:36 GMT
I just want a ticket.
|
|
|
Post by Hobhead on May 2, 2017 21:01:56 GMT
The Cow's Arse equivalent of a meltdown right here.
|
|
|
Post by bantam147 on May 3, 2017 12:36:48 GMT
Doyle McMahon Rory NKP Meredith Marshall Vincelot Cullen Law Clarke Wyke
Don't risk Jones. Gillead to come on for Law if we need to open up a bit more.
|
|
|
Post by Neshead on May 3, 2017 17:00:25 GMT
Doyle McMahon Rory NKP Meredith Marshall Vincelot Cullen Law Clarke Wyke Don't risk Jones. Gillead to come on for Law if we need to open up a bit more. I'd go with that, i think the team virtually picks itself. No messing with 3 at the back or anything like that. A technically very good side but very beatable. The most unphysical side in the division.
|
|
God
Sparks is a cunt Bantam
Posts: 172
|
Post by God on May 3, 2017 17:02:54 GMT
2-1 to city
|
|
|
Post by Hobhead on May 3, 2017 17:03:39 GMT
And that wouldn't be good enough.
|
|