|
Post by Lethal Jizzle on Oct 17, 2020 19:12:48 GMT
These lot are shite we really should be doing back to back wins here. Can we? Do you change anyone? Change formation?
For me if Staunton is fit then put him at LB put Wood LW put Pritchard at RW and we should win by a couple
|
|
|
Post by Neshead on Oct 17, 2020 19:42:39 GMT
These lot are shite we really should be doing back to back wins here. Can we? Do you change anyone? Change formation? For me if Staunton is fit then put him at LB put Wood LW put Pritchard at RW and we should win by a couple Fuck off.
|
|
|
Post by fish on Oct 17, 2020 19:54:34 GMT
These lot are shite we really should be doing back to back wins here. Can we? Do you change anyone? Change formation? For me if Staunton is fit then put him at LB put Wood LW put Pritchard at RW and we should win by a couple that you Stuart?
|
|
|
Post by Lethal Jizzle on Oct 17, 2020 19:56:36 GMT
These lot are shite we really should be doing back to back wins here. Can we? Do you change anyone? Change formation? For me if Staunton is fit then put him at LB put Wood LW put Pritchard at RW and we should win by a couple that you Stuart? If I was Stuart I'd be leaving DMH in the team because of unfounded belief
|
|
moshi
Sparks is a cunt Bantam
Posts: 118
|
Post by moshi on Oct 17, 2020 21:05:48 GMT
Unless Staunton fit again same line up and 442 for me. Not really many options is the reality, perhaps Evans, but he’s shown absolutely fuck all since he arrived.
But I wouldn’t be surprised to see things switched around to include Billy and upset the balance in the team. Nothing against him really, but we all called it when he signed- sacrificing the rest of the team to fit him in - while his powers have faded.
|
|
|
Post by hobbes on Oct 17, 2020 21:21:25 GMT
Unless Staunton fit again same line up and 442 for me. Not really many options is the reality, perhaps Evans, but he’s shown absolutely fuck all since he arrived. But I wouldn’t be surprised to see things switched around to include Billy and upset the balance in the team. Nothing against him really, but we all called it when he signed- sacrificing the rest of the team to fit him in - while his powers have faded. Only formation Clarke should play in is 4-4-1-1. On the bench.
|
|
|
Post by Hoochy on Oct 18, 2020 8:14:53 GMT
He's got to keep the same 11 if all fit. I don't think anyone had a bad game really. Evans is out for 2 weeks I think I heard. Can't see Walsall being as bad as Mansfield.
|
|
|
Post by bantam147 on Oct 18, 2020 14:04:20 GMT
Walsall are unbeaten in 13. Wont be an easy game. We do need to keep this side and system though.
|
|
|
Post by Hobhead on Oct 18, 2020 14:18:59 GMT
He's got to keep the same 11 if all fit. I don't think anyone had a bad game really. Evans is out for 2 weeks I think I heard. Can't see Walsall being as bad as Mansfield. Clarke will start.
|
|
|
Post by Hoochy on Oct 18, 2020 14:28:46 GMT
He's got to keep the same 11 if all fit. I don't think anyone had a bad game really. Evans is out for 2 weeks I think I heard. Can't see Walsall being as bad as Mansfield. Clarke will start. If he puts him wide left or right and he does a proper job with the defensive side of the role too then that's fine. If he tries to shoe horn him onto a 10 role weakening the front 2 and making Cooke lame then it's inexcusable after the best team performance for about a year.
|
|
|
Post by Neshead on Oct 18, 2020 15:10:17 GMT
If he puts him wide left or right and he does a proper job with the defensive side of the role too then that's fine. If he tries to shoe horn him onto a 10 role weakening the front 2 and making Cooke lame then it's inexcusable after the best team performance for about a year. Clarke could play wide but it would have to be part of a front three. It's square pegs in round holes again though.
|
|
|
Post by Hoochy on Oct 18, 2020 15:29:27 GMT
If he puts him wide left or right and he does a proper job with the defensive side of the role too then that's fine. If he tries to shoe horn him onto a 10 role weakening the front 2 and making Cooke lame then it's inexcusable after the best team performance for about a year. Clarke could play wide but it would have to be part of a front three. It's square pegs in round holes again though. Agreed, I hope he doesn't play and he sticks with what worked yesterday.
|
|
|
Post by Hobhead on Oct 19, 2020 19:22:17 GMT
‘May change things to match Walsall’:
|
|
|
Post by Hobhead on Oct 19, 2020 19:29:09 GMT
Who wants to bet that ‘matching Walsall’ involves picking Billy Clarke?
|
|
|
Post by Lofty on Oct 19, 2020 19:55:39 GMT
‘May change things to match Walsall’: Classic Stuart. 😐
|
|
|
Post by Hoochy on Oct 19, 2020 20:19:36 GMT
433 on Saturday? Looked 442 to me.
|
|
|
Post by mikehunt on Oct 19, 2020 20:28:51 GMT
433 on Saturday? Looked 442 to me. SM: "Jamie, it was never a 4-4-2 in a month of Sundays."
|
|
|
Post by Train (F-2547) on Oct 19, 2020 21:04:21 GMT
It was a nailed on 442. The four defenders, four mods and 2 strikers gave it away.
Let’s be honest if it was 433 someone spent all match out of position.
|
|
|
Post by Train (F-2547) on Oct 19, 2020 21:07:13 GMT
Who wants to bet that ‘matching Walsall’ involves picking Billy Clarke? Offers us something different m8. Walsall obviously play a high pressing fast paced wide game so billy will be needed to give us bodies in the middle. Or somat
|
|
goddeano
Due Diligence Bantam
Posts: 271
|
Post by goddeano on Oct 20, 2020 17:39:42 GMT
Changing the team would require an immediate #McCallSOut I'm afraid
|
|