|
Post by Hoochy on Jul 17, 2020 19:38:06 GMT
Bad enough being stalked but imagine it being Hoochy the chess pervert. Actually, speaking of chess, bloke where i've been working plays for Yorkshire. Probably makes his own cheesecakes as well. Me and my brother came in the top 7 of the schools Yorkshire championship held at st bedes many moons ago. But I quickly realised how uncool it was, shame on you Hoochy nonce Won the Yorkshire league for St Bede's with me on board 4. 🖕🖕
|
|
|
Post by Lethal Jizzle on Jul 17, 2020 19:43:36 GMT
Me and my brother came in the top 7 of the schools Yorkshire championship held at st bedes many moons ago. But I quickly realised how uncool it was, shame on you Hoochy nonce Won the Yorkshire league for St Bede's with me on board 4. 🖕🖕 Woodend were by far the best school it's just most of the better players were all fucked on speed and coke.
|
|
|
Post by Neshead on Jul 17, 2020 20:54:40 GMT
Won the Yorkshire league for St Bede's with me on board 4. 🖕🖕 Woodend were by far the best school it's just most of the better players were all fucked on speed and coke. What a school that was.
|
|
|
Post by Hobhead on Jul 17, 2020 20:57:33 GMT
Me and my brother came in the top 7 of the schools Yorkshire championship held at st bedes many moons ago. But I quickly realised how uncool it was, shame on you Hoochy nonce Won the Yorkshire league for St Bede's with me on board 4. 🖕🖕 Board four? Retard.
|
|
|
Post by Lethal Jizzle on Jul 17, 2020 20:59:26 GMT
Woodend were by far the best school it's just most of the better players were all fucked on speed and coke. What a school that was. Believe it or not Mark Finan if you remember him was the best, horrible little smackrat though
|
|
|
Post by Hoochy on Jul 17, 2020 21:04:15 GMT
Won the Yorkshire league for St Bede's with me on board 4. 🖕🖕 Board four? Retard. I like chess. I never ever said I was any good.
|
|
|
Post by Neshead on Jul 17, 2020 21:06:17 GMT
Believe it or not Mark Finan if you remember him was the best, horrible little smackrat though I do remember him. Mr Bates was the guy who did the chess at Woodend if my memory serves.
|
|
|
Post by Hobhead on Jul 17, 2020 21:07:18 GMT
I like chess. I never ever said I was any good. I only ever made board three but there was an Indian kid with handwriting like a Franciscan monk and a Jewish kid who was some sort of child prodigy on boards one and two. I just couldn’t dislodge them.
|
|
|
Post by Neshead on Jul 17, 2020 21:09:40 GMT
I like chess. I never ever said I was any good. I only ever made board three but there was an Indian kid with handwriting like a Franciscan monk and a Jewish kid who was some sort of child prodigy on boards one and two. I just couldn’t dislodge them. Where the fuck did you go to school, the Xavier institute?
|
|
|
Post by Hobhead on Jul 17, 2020 21:18:24 GMT
I only ever made board three but there was an Indian kid with handwriting like a Franciscan monk and a Jewish kid who was some sort of child prodigy on boards one and two. I just couldn’t dislodge them. Where the fuck did you go to school, the Xavier institute? Close. Clayton.
|
|
|
Post by Lethal Jizzle on Jul 18, 2020 4:41:30 GMT
Believe it or not Mark Finan if you remember him was the best, horrible little smackrat though I do remember him. Mr Bates was the guy who did the chess at Woodend if my memory serves. Betts....died a couple of years ago
|
|
|
Post by Neshead on Jul 18, 2020 6:44:12 GMT
I do remember him. Mr Bates was the guy who did the chess at Woodend if my memory serves. Betts....died a couple of years ago Yeah, that was her.
|
|
|
Post by Hoochy on Jul 19, 2020 10:36:50 GMT
widthofapost.com/2020/07/19/billy-clarke-the-return-of-the-almost-bradford-city-hero/A poorly written article with an overtly positive narrative. I'm just not seeing it. I like Clarke, he seems like a nice enough lad but we're talking about our football team here and what he can bring. He's neither a striker nor a midfielder and I don't see where he'll fit into a Stuart side. He usually likes to play a 442 which means that Billy has to be up front where he looks a bit lost or in midfield where he can't do the defensive side well enough. He'll play as this mystery number 10 alongside another striker but he'll come deep and leave his partner isolated. I could see it working potentially with Vaughan but you could see Vaughan's frustration building last year as he got starved of service. The other option is to play him as part of a 3 in midfield in a 532 with wingbacks providing the width. I'm confident that Woods could do the job on the left but have no idea about Sutton on the right. We've also just signed DMH and have Pritchard so presumably Stuart wants to use wingers. I think it's fairly lazy 'scouting' to bring him in again and unless we have some inkling that some strikers are leaving it's unnecessary. We've already got 4 strikers contracted for next season so it's not an area that we should be prioritising.
|
|
|
Post by Bacon on Jul 19, 2020 10:56:57 GMT
widthofapost.com/2020/07/19/billy-clarke-the-return-of-the-almost-bradford-city-hero/A poorly written article with an overtly positive narrative. I'm just not seeing it. I like Clarke, he seems like a nice enough lad but we're talking about our football team here and what he can bring. He's neither a striker nor a midfielder and I don't see where he'll fit into a Stuart side. He usually likes to play a 442 which means that Billy has to be up front where he looks a bit lost or in midfield where he can't do the defensive side well enough. He'll play as this mystery number 10 alongside another striker but he'll come deep and leave his partner isolated. I could see it working potentially with Vaughan but you could see Vaughan's frustration building last year as he got starved of service. The other option is to play him as part of a 3 in midfield in a 532 with wingbacks providing the width. I'm confident that Woods could do the job on the left but have no idea about Sutton on the right. We've also just signed DMH and have Pritchard so presumably Stuart wants to use wingers. I think it's fairly lazy 'scouting' to bring him in again and unless we have some inkling that some strikers are leaving it's unnecessary. We've already got 4 strikers contracted for next season so it's not an area that we should be prioritising. Boo! Back to chess chat.
|
|
|
Post by Hobhead on Jul 19, 2020 11:10:02 GMT
widthofapost.com/2020/07/19/billy-clarke-the-return-of-the-almost-bradford-city-hero/A poorly written article with an overtly positive narrative. I'm just not seeing it. I like Clarke, he seems like a nice enough lad but we're talking about our football team here and what he can bring. He's neither a striker nor a midfielder and I don't see where he'll fit into a Stuart side. He usually likes to play a 442 which means that Billy has to be up front where he looks a bit lost or in midfield where he can't do the defensive side well enough. He'll play as this mystery number 10 alongside another striker but he'll come deep and leave his partner isolated. I could see it working potentially with Vaughan but you could see Vaughan's frustration building last year as he got starved of service. The other option is to play him as part of a 3 in midfield in a 532 with wingbacks providing the width. I'm confident that Woods could do the job on the left but have no idea about Sutton on the right. We've also just signed DMH and have Pritchard so presumably Stuart wants to use wingers. I think it's fairly lazy 'scouting' to bring him in again and unless we have some inkling that some strikers are leaving it's unnecessary. We've already got 4 strikers contracted for next season so it's not an area that we should be prioritising. The more I think about it the worse it looks. He’s a player that’s pretty shit who can’t play any particular position. It’s an absolutely dire signing.
|
|
|
Post by Neshead on Jul 19, 2020 12:42:28 GMT
widthofapost.com/2020/07/19/billy-clarke-the-return-of-the-almost-bradford-city-hero/A poorly written article with an overtly positive narrative. I'm just not seeing it. I like Clarke, he seems like a nice enough lad but we're talking about our football team here and what he can bring. He's neither a striker nor a midfielder and I don't see where he'll fit into a Stuart side. He usually likes to play a 442 which means that Billy has to be up front where he looks a bit lost or in midfield where he can't do the defensive side well enough. He'll play as this mystery number 10 alongside another striker but he'll come deep and leave his partner isolated. I could see it working potentially with Vaughan but you could see Vaughan's frustration building last year as he got starved of service. The other option is to play him as part of a 3 in midfield in a 532 with wingbacks providing the width. I'm confident that Woods could do the job on the left but have no idea about Sutton on the right. We've also just signed DMH and have Pritchard so presumably Stuart wants to use wingers. I think it's fairly lazy 'scouting' to bring him in again and unless we have some inkling that some strikers are leaving it's unnecessary. We've already got 4 strikers contracted for next season so it's not an area that we should be prioritising. The more I think about it the worse it looks. He’s a player that’s pretty shit who can’t play any particular position. It’s an absolutely dire signing. The problem isn't Clarke, on his day he's a good addition at league 2 level. It's the thought that's gone into the signing, all those players out there looking for work and we go back to the same tired transfer formula. Yet another 30 odd year old, shouldn't we be looking toward the future. I can't see Vaughan being here, we can't go with all those the balance is wrong. Donaldo ain't going, neither is Novak. Guthrie ain't getting any takers so only Vaughan left. We're yet again shiehorning players in because they're cheap.
|
|
|
Post by rahicscissorbudget on Jul 20, 2020 9:32:01 GMT
widthofapost.com/2020/07/19/billy-clarke-the-return-of-the-almost-bradford-city-hero/A poorly written article with an overtly positive narrative. I'm just not seeing it. I like Clarke, he seems like a nice enough lad but we're talking about our football team here and what he can bring. He's neither a striker nor a midfielder and I don't see where he'll fit into a Stuart side. He usually likes to play a 442 which means that Billy has to be up front where he looks a bit lost or in midfield where he can't do the defensive side well enough. He'll play as this mystery number 10 alongside another striker but he'll come deep and leave his partner isolated. I could see it working potentially with Vaughan but you could see Vaughan's frustration building last year as he got starved of service. The other option is to play him as part of a 3 in midfield in a 532 with wingbacks providing the width. I'm confident that Woods could do the job on the left but have no idea about Sutton on the right. We've also just signed DMH and have Pritchard so presumably Stuart wants to use wingers. I think it's fairly lazy 'scouting' to bring him in again and unless we have some inkling that some strikers are leaving it's unnecessary. We've already got 4 strikers contracted for next season so it's not an area that we should be prioritising. This or 343 with him behind Vaughn and Novak/Donaldson is the only way this squad makes sense but we don’t have the defensive players for 352/532 or 343 and teams would just batter us down our right. It’s just another shit squad that doesn’t make sense. It’s so obvious no thought is going into it.
|
|
|
Post by fish on Jul 20, 2020 11:49:23 GMT
widthofapost.com/2020/07/19/billy-clarke-the-return-of-the-almost-bradford-city-hero/A poorly written article with an overtly positive narrative. I'm just not seeing it. I like Clarke, he seems like a nice enough lad but we're talking about our football team here and what he can bring. He's neither a striker nor a midfielder and I don't see where he'll fit into a Stuart side. He usually likes to play a 442 which means that Billy has to be up front where he looks a bit lost or in midfield where he can't do the defensive side well enough. He'll play as this mystery number 10 alongside another striker but he'll come deep and leave his partner isolated. I could see it working potentially with Vaughan but you could see Vaughan's frustration building last year as he got starved of service. The other option is to play him as part of a 3 in midfield in a 532 with wingbacks providing the width. I'm confident that Woods could do the job on the left but have no idea about Sutton on the right. We've also just signed DMH and have Pritchard so presumably Stuart wants to use wingers. I think it's fairly lazy 'scouting' to bring him in again and unless we have some inkling that some strikers are leaving it's unnecessary. We've already got 4 strikers contracted for next season so it's not an area that we should be prioritising. This or 343 with him behind Vaughn and Novak/Donaldson is the only way this squad makes sense but we don’t have the defensive players for 352/532 or 343 and teams would just batter us down our right. It’s just another shit squad that doesn’t make sense. It’s so obvious no thought is going into it. it will be a 442/4411 variant with Clarke playing off Vaughan if he's still here or god forbid Novak or Donaldson. One out and out winger in Ismail/DMH on one side with someone like Pritchard playing narrow on the other. Thinking back to McCall's last spell he never really played two out and out strikers together. It was always Wyke/Hanson with Clarke or Hiwula either playing just behind or wide left.
|
|
Aaron
Sparks is a cunt Bantam
Posts: 164
|
Post by Aaron on Jul 20, 2020 12:01:45 GMT
This or 343 with him behind Vaughn and Novak/Donaldson is the only way this squad makes sense but we don’t have the defensive players for 352/532 or 343 and teams would just batter us down our right. It’s just another shit squad that doesn’t make sense. It’s so obvious no thought is going into it. it will be a 442/4411 variant with Clarke playing off Vaughan if he's still here or god forbid Novak or Donaldson. One out and out winger in Ismail/DMH on one side with someone like Pritchard playing narrow on the other. Thinking back to McCall's last spell he never really played two out and out strikers together. It was always Wyke/Hanson with Clarke or Hiwula either playing just behind or wide left. Either that or it wouldn't surprise me if we sporadically use Clarke as the slightly narrower wide man out left to drift into 'the hole', especially with how paper thin it seems like we're going to be in regards to our midfield and wide options when you account for Zeli's cheesestring-hamstrings
|
|
|
Post by hobbes on Jul 20, 2020 12:41:10 GMT
Cheesestring - hamstrings lol.
|
|